Had a W123 240D, 3 x W123 300D's and a W116 240D - LOOOVE diesel.
While the naturally aspirated variants are very sloooow to accelerate - man do they just keep going! 160 kph, noooo problemo! and as solid on the road at that speed, as they are at 60 kph. One of my 300Ds was a station wagon 5 speed factory manual. Fully laden (adults & gear for a weak on the road), high speed cruising, 7 L/100 kilometres ( 33 miles /gal?) - this in a 1985 built vehicle!!!!
- Your generalisations on oil capacity/filters is BS.
- Your statement on turbo charging is also BS - while a turbo will generally improve a diesels performance (just like a petrol) is not actually required.
- Diesel engines, of the same swept capacity, will in general outperform & use less fuel than a petrol when it comes to work (torque) - not many petrol trucks & tractors around these days.
- Car (petrol) drivers do not, in general, like the lower acceleration of diesels, the smell of the fuel & exhaust and the usually higher purchase price.
- Diesel engines will usually outlast their petrol equivalent - the exception being where the manufacture tries to achieve petrol type exceleration/weight /cost. These engines have a troubled history & are most often rubbish. Dont purchase a diesel if you \want to get burning rubber at the traffic lights.
- For a diesel powered vehicle variant to be cost effective, you must be doing high mileage or towing/carrying (working)
- Industrial equipment (large mowers, etc) are usually diesel due to the better torque characteristics of the engine & the lower fuel consumption.
- In service time, injectors/turbos will wear out, no matter petrol or diesel.
- What the uneducated /fashion/market driven public do/purchase is little indication of any products actual worth.
In short you don't actually know what you are talking about
But you took the topic away from where the question was asked and took it into tractor trailers, and automobile engines of the diesel variety.
Some of the things you said that are absolute fact like diesels almost always outlive their gasoline counterparts, wow true, that is because these diesel engines were designed from the ground up to be diesel engines.
No one here was having a discussion about whether a twin gasoline engine or a 3 cylinder yanmar diesel as to which one was better than the other.

They were only asking if you convert a Briggs & Stratton engine over to run on diesel.
The quickest and best answer is that it wouldn't be worth your time.
Like one of the other answers stated, while it is technically possible to do, it still wouldn't work well and it would have no longevity.
In fact, just to get it to function at all you probably couldn't even use the original block so would it still be a Briggs & Stratton engine?
You could build or buy a custom block and use some of the Briggs & Stratton parts but that goes back to the original best answer... It wouldn't be worth your time, or money.
Diesels can certainly be great when done right but there is nothing going to be done right about trying to convert a 44XXXX series Briggs to run on diesel.
Propane or natural gas is quite simple and will work just fine.
Propane's probably the easiest because you can have little tanks like the little green ones or you can run it off a torch bottle but actually I'm thinking push mowers here and you could take you a barbecue grill 20 pounder and put a hanging bracket right between the handles of your lawn mower or even a little platform there about 8 in off the ground and run your lawn mower for a long time on propane.
I will say that while propane and natural gas both burn cleaner, you are likely to have more problems if you put a lot of hours on one of these engines with propane or natural gas then if you just use gasoline like they were designed.
More likely to have valve problems using propane than gasoline BUT sometimes this is a moot point because most of these engines never get enough hours on them and their lifetime to ever come close to wearing anything out.
They simply have some needed repair at one time or another and they're replaced or junked because of that.
I can't tell you how many 17 to 24 year old riding lawn mowers I have serviced and how many I have seen replaced that were only maybe 15 to 22 years old because they needed some repair and mainly because most shops are so expensive it just wasn't worth putting that kind of money into it.
Not a single one of these engines was ever worn out and they probably could have easily gone another 10 plus years had they have had a simple repair.
In my area the average person with a 42-in rider plus between 25 and 35 hours per year maximum.
Some people in some areas don't put that many hours on them and of course some do more but unless you're cutting more than one lot or trying to cut commercially, people in my area do 25 to 35 a year.
You can do the math but I see so many lawn mowers disposed of and replaced when they don't even have 225- 275 hours on them.
In fact, in the 10k+ of mowers that I have serviced over the past 14 years really do I see any above 325.
This is simply because by that point they have had the mower so long that it's really old to them and it's getting pretty janky and probably has really floppy steering and the seats all chewed up and all that so they're ready for a new one.
Only occasionally will I see one in the 400s and that's been twice.
I keep track of all these numbers quite religiously.
The highest hour engines I have had come in were 879 on a John Deere commercial that was a private owner for five or six years and was about 11 years old when I saw it.
Had another Husqvarna zero turn with a twin Briggs 44xxxxx that to my amazement had over 1200 hours on it.
A lawn tractor style with 742,
And only one or two up there above 425.
99% of the ones that have come in have had under 375 on them and the majority of them have been in the low to mid 200s.
Anyways, converting a Briggs or any other gasoline engine for a lawn mower over to diesel is going to make its life expectancy under 1 hour.