Yes I've seen your illustration and I could really care less and I'm really not interested in pulling the covers off a perfectly good running engine to compare, I think that would be absolutely ridiculous.
So you got no problem with my critique of the design, you simply believe it is "abolutely ridculous" to investigate what you own - I got that right?
I've heard this song and dance before about the Kohler Courage engine being a bad engine just because a few individuals say they had problems with the Kohler and the same with the Stihl 4 mix engines being terrible because they need to have valves adjusted all the time and they a maintenance issue.
And I your's - "song and dance", like. It is almost a mantra among the "mine's fine, what's up with you" crowd.
NOTE "you", not "it".
The problem with all the song and dance is that for every one individual that has a problem you have a thousand and more that run the stuff untold hours and never have an issue.
Some generalisation you make there.
Your're a LC Guy, right?
How could you possibly *know* "thousands/never have an issue".
Answer is you do not, you simply sing and dance out the tune wishing it were so.
I found a design fault AFTER a symptom, I then experienced a repeat shortly after the first.
I reported on the instances, supplying facts, not invention, not rhetorical misinforming diatribe as a rebuttal.
Oh, wait... there was none. Not until you (Ric) got your fiddle out posting chapter and verse of a well known tune.
NO FACTS, NO MECHS, JUST SALES LOLLY.
[...]
I've run the Kawasaki engines that I have for almost a 1000 hrs and never had an issue and at this point even if I did have a problem with any equipment that I run daily I sure wouldn't condemn the whole line and everything they make.
Let's not broaden the smoke screen in attempting to attach credibility, hey?
Your Kawasaki engines may well use a different design, WE (royal) do not know, you refuse to go look, opting for a string of rhetoric which frankly means nothing to those looking to part with good dollars. Your "say so" isn't good enough when the FACTS are there in plain view.
I got no issue with you personally, I however do know the stereotype well so will discredit the tune each time it is played.
Discuss that with <Rivets> should you wish to question my integrity.
Ric.
Your're the one with "moderator" as a 'title', you have already removed - or had removed - one of my posts referring to your attitude on the Kawa engine issue, without consulting me I add.
Hardly a responsible action it does not surprise me when - as I read now - you have no argument with the science, you simply object to the facts being published.
Please do lay out which brand names are fair game for critique so that WE (royal) all know your rules.
Thanks.
KK