Cub Cadet XT1 vs Husqvarna TS275XD

I hope y'all can please help me here on some advice.I just purchased a CC XT1 with 50 in Kohler 24hp from Tractor Supply for $2999 out the door. I noticed right after I found a Husqvarna TS275XD with the tuff Kawasaki 23 hp for $4100 out the door but they have to order that one and said that if I would like I could swap out and pay the difference........Here is where my thinking is I know one is 50 inch and other is 48 in and that is really not a big deal or me. I have a left leg above knee amputee and the brake lever to push it down on the CC I have to press really hard to get it to start..............I didn't realize that the CC didn't have front wheel bearings and it has aluminum deck spindles and the Husky has Cast Iron deck spindles and has front wheel bearings. The CC has the front cast iron axle assembly with the welded front axle spindles while the Husky that you can change them out if you had to .........They both have the K46 and the Husky is a locking and CC isn't.... The hood on the Husky is all metal and CC isn't....... The Husky looks to have a nicer seat with higher back and arm rest and also it has a hour meter I think and CC doesn't.....anyway what I am asking basically is I know there is a big price jump and dont mind paying it but I am worried that the main thing is getting parts and is it easier to work on as well.The front end on both is got me,is there a reason that the CC folks made the front end where you have to buy the whole assembly if you have to replace one spindle?I know there is some more equipment the Husky has the CC doesn't but these are just off top of my head.I know on both machines that the warranty is like a lot and its not worth the paper its written on so thats why I told them I would opt out on that extra.......................I sure appreciate yalls help but being 60 I have some health issues and we did try several manufactures of zero turns but it was awkward for me getting on and off so we just gonna stay with the rider even know they are now more than the zeros--- Thank yall so so much for yalls time and patience with me on this.Kenny Morris Wade,Ms

For the build quality, I would go with the Husqvarna, but shop around and see if any of the area tractor dealers can give you a better deal along with service capability. Tractor Supply is just a box store vendor, and their prices have been higher than most around. Tractor supply has no service capability.

KennyM said:

I hope y'all can please help me here on some advice.I just purchased a CC XT1 with 50 in Kohler 24hp from Tractor Supply for $2999 out the door. I noticed right after I found a Husqvarna TS275XD with the tuff Kawasaki 23 hp for $4100 out the door but they have to order that one and said that if I would like I could swap out and pay the difference........Here is where my thinking is I know one is 50 inch and other is 48 in and that is really not a big deal or me. I have a left leg above knee amputee and the brake lever to push it down on the CC I have to press really hard to get it to start..............I didn't realize that the CC didn't have front wheel bearings and it has aluminum deck spindles and the Husky has Cast Iron deck spindles and has front wheel bearings. The CC has the front cast iron axle assembly with the welded front axle spindles while the Husky that you can change them out if you had to .........They both have the K46 and the Husky is a locking and CC isn't.... The hood on the Husky is all metal and CC isn't....... The Husky looks to have a nicer seat with higher back and arm rest and also it has a hour meter I think and CC doesn't.....anyway what I am asking basically is I know there is a big price jump and dont mind paying it but I am worried that the main thing is getting parts and is it easier to work on as well.The front end on both is got me,is there a reason that the CC folks made the front end where you have to buy the whole assembly if you have to replace one spindle?I know there is some more equipment the Husky has the CC doesn't but these are just off top of my head.I know on both machines that the warranty is like a lot and its not worth the paper its written on so thats why I told them I would opt out on that extra.......................I sure appreciate yalls help but being 60 I have some health issues and we did try several manufactures of zero turns but it was awkward for me getting on and off so we just gonna stay with the rider even know they are now more than the zeros--- Thank yall so so much for yalls time and patience with me on this.Kenny Morris Wade,Ms

Click to expand...

Kenny, based on what you've described, I would lean toward the Husqvarna if the extra $1,100 isn't a concern — but I would make the decision primarily around ergonomics and serviceability rather than the extra features.

The biggest issue for me in your situation is the brake pedal/lever. Since you have to put significant pressure on it with your left leg, I would make sure you can comfortably operate the Husqvarna's controls before making the swap. A mower that's mechanically better but uncomfortable or difficult for you to operate isn't really an upgrade.

Your observations about the front end and spindles are also worth considering. A serviceable front spindle arrangement is attractive because individual components can potentially be replaced rather than dealing with a larger assembly. I'd also give some weight to the Husqvarna's cast-iron spindle arrangement, locking differential, heavier-duty front-end components and more substantial seat if you're going to keep the tractor for many years.

That said, I wouldn't automatically assume the Husqvarna will be cheaper or easier to maintain. Before paying the additional $1,100, I'd call the local dealers for both brands and ask them to price the common replacement parts: front axle/spindles, deck spindles, belts, blades, pulleys and transmission-related parts. Also ask how quickly they can obtain those parts. That will tell you much more about long-term ownership than the specifications on the brochures.

The K46 is another important point. If your property has significant hills or you're pulling heavy loads, I'd pay close attention to the transmission's workload and maintenance requirements. Neither tractor is something I'd choose for repeatedly towing very heavy loads up steep hills.

For your particular situation, I'd rank the decision this way:

1. Can you comfortably operate the controls?
2. Local parts and service availability
3. Front axle/spindle serviceability
4. Deck spindle construction
5. Transmission requirements for your terrain
6. Seat and overall comfort
7. Then the extra features

And honestly, at 60 with the mobility issue you've described, I wouldn't underestimate the importance of getting on and off the machine comfortably. You could have the best-built tractor in the world, but if getting on, starting, stopping or dismounting is awkward, you'll regret the purchase.

If the Husqvarna fits you better and the dealer can demonstrate good parts/service support, I'd be inclined to pay the difference. If the Cub Cadet is substantially easier for you to operate and your property doesn't demand more from the machine, I'd keep the $1,100 and put it toward maintenance or accessories.

I'd also take both machines for a proper test drive before making the final decision. Your personal comfort is more important here than a specification sheet.

Thank yall so so so much-Im gonna run back over and see if I can locate a dealer and willget back on here this afternoon for sure.Bare with me.